Home / Standards
One page, one useful answer
Each page owns one primary question. Broad guides orient readers; supporting articles answer narrower questions; reference tools provide compact lookup value. Pages should answer the main question early and make uncertainties visible.
Evidence and language
Medical claims require appropriate sources. Mechanistic explanations, clinical findings and manufacturer claims are distinguished. We avoid guaranteed results, unsupported superlatives and language that implies all devices or products are interchangeable.
Authorship and review
Real author and reviewer identities must be displayed when assigned. A reviewer is credited only after actually reviewing the material. Pages disclose AI-assisted research and writing and state when medical review has not occurred. No generated persona, doctor or credential is used.
Visual integrity
Conceptual product imagery is illustrative. We do not generate patient outcomes, fake before-and-after photographs or clinical evidence. Charts must explain their assumptions and limitations. Dates change only after a meaningful review or revision.
Publication standard
Our publication checks cover claim accuracy, clear purpose, traceable sources, related links and readable mobile layouts. A finished layout does not confer clinical review. Review status must describe work that actually occurred.
